[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdesdk/kbugbuster
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2001-12-01 11:11:06
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 01 December 2001 00:07, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2001 19:16, David Faure wrote:
> > kdesdk/kbugbuster AUTHORS,1.2,1.3
> > Author: faure
> > Fri Nov 30 18:16:22 UTC 2001
> >
> >
> > Modified Files:
> >          AUTHORS
> > Log Message:
> > First commit in kdesdk/kbugbuster ;)
> 
> We could always moderate this down to "-2, first post" (or whatever that's 
> called on slashdot ;-)

;-)

> Either way, I planned to have KBB in kdesdk for KDE 3.1. So should I now be 
> honoured or disturbed for having it in as early as 3.0? :-) Functionally it 
> is indeed a worthy app, but I think the GUI could need a decent bit of 
> polishing before it is really well. And now I have to obey feature and 
> message freezes :-/

Oh. Didn't think about all this. I realize I should have asked you first.
I simply saw that many developers were not using kbugbuster because they
don't have kdenonbeta, so I thought that putting it in kdesdk would help.
This is really a _developer_ app. Translations and freezes shouldn't be too
litterally applied to it IMHO, it's not an app for users.
The app starts to be really useful. I think it'd be a shame not to make it 
available to all developers.

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://perso.mandrakesoft.com/~david/ , http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE 3.0: Konquering the Desktops

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]