[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-buildsystem
Subject:    Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-12-16 23:07:04
Message-ID: 4885350.RAjqlMVEDv () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas
> > va> 
> > escriure:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >>> 
> >>> Alex
> >> 
> >> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> >> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
> >> needed.
> > 
> > So let's go for the cmake increase?
> > 
> > Anyone against it? (I will need an answer before RC1 tag on tuesday night)
> 
> I know I'm not helping, and maybe it was already discussed again so please
> disregard this in case, but wasn't there a long and heated discussion about
> this whose result was to go with 2.8.8 for kdelibs 4.10? And kdepimlibs is
> considered "part" of kdelibs afaik.

Yes, there was a huge discussion, but if you can't make it work with 2.8.8, 
what's the point of requiring it and not 2.8.9?

Albert

> 
> See:
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=134890793800002&r=1&w=2
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=135058553600001&r=1&w=2
> 
> Ciao
_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]