[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-buildsystem
Subject:    Re: Please review: cmake check for Cagibi
From:       Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-08-24 18:02:49
Message-ID: 201008242002.49496.reavertm () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 24 of August 2010 02:34:05 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Mardi, le 24 août 2010, à 01:24, Yury G. Kudryashov a écrit:
> > BTW, what about adding one more parameter to m_l_f that tells whether
> > dependency is a runtime dep (default to FALSE)? Or even add another macro
> > because "required" flag MUST be FALSE for runtime dependencies? Then
> > we'll be able to say:
> > == THE FOLLOWING RUNTIME DEPENDENCIES ARE MISSING ON YOUR SYSTEM ==
> 
> That might be indeed most useful and nice to have, I agree (non-packager,
> but self-compiler :) ).

Otherwise listing runtime-only dependencies in README file is just as good 
(what said kajonggh does for instance).

It's even better than CMake checks in case all runtime-only dependencies are 
met (so no missing deps are reported) - as packager is not aware of them.

-- 
regards
MM

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]