[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-buildsystem
Subject: Status of cmake + kde
From: montel () kde ! org (Laurent Montel)
Date: 2006-03-05 22:41:35
Message-ID: 200603052341.36029.montel () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 05 March 2006 22:49, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 05 March 2006 21:28, you wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Today I started to port all kde module (which compile fully) to cmake
> > build system (kdetoys/kdepim/kdeedu/kdeaccessibility/kdebase)
> > (When other module will compile fully I will add cmake build system)
> >
> > Now we can configure it and start to compile.
>
> Cool :-)
>
> > For the moment there is some missing check (look at into config.h.cmake
> > and ConfigureChecks.cmake)
> > Some cmake module is missing (for example libmad cmake module etc.)
> >
> > For the moment I didn't test compile under MacOs or Windows.
> >
> > Now I need some help to finish all cmake portage.
>
> Sure :-)
> I didn't have time this weekend, I was at Linuxtag in Chemnitz.
> I want to have a look at the RPATH and depending library stuff tomorrow.
> I'd also like to rename LIB_KPARTS to KDE4_KPARTS_LIBRARY etc.
Ok no problem. It's easy to rename it bu using a "perl -pi -e" command
> Maybe this should also be done in the am2cmake script, this would reduce
> the amount of manual work required.
For me we must change am2cmake too.
> What do you think ?
>
> Which modules are currently supposed to be compilable for kde 4 ? All ?
all without kdewebdev and koffice (for the moment)
> If so, we should decide who works on which modules.
Yes it's a good idea
> But at first we should
> try to get everything right for kdebase.
There is a bug into kdebase/konqueror. I didn't success to fix it.
> Bye
> Alex
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic