Dear Michael, > > In this, it is quite unfortunate that kmail uses its own inbox in > > Mail/Inbox. Imagine: * I read a mail with kmail and decide to leave it in > > my inbox to answer it later * the next time, I use pine - but the above > > mail is gone into ~Mail/inbox. Now I have to tell pine to go into this > > special folder. My whole workflow is broken. > > What about setting up a local POP3 server if not already running and using > that instead of the local account? It should be easier than this. What if I'm not the sysadmin on my cluster? See below. > > The same problem with procmail. Why do I need to do something special to > > use procmail? Pine is fine if procmail writes into ~Mail. Why can't kmail? > A way to use procmail together with KMail is described in the FAQ. You are right, of course. But the way described is too complicated, in my opinion. When I want to add another destination mailfile for procmail I would have to configure it twice: once in my .procmailrc, and the other time in the kmail config. Thats too much. What happens if I change a mailfolder name in .procmailrc but forget it for kmail? Right now my .procmailrc knows about 15 destination mailfolders. The probability of screwing up something is high. I assume the two problems are really one: kmail can not deal with folders that change while kmail is running. This means it can't deal with procmail writing into some folder in ~/Mail and it can't deal with the inbox staying /var/spool/mail/ because in this case the local mail daemon would write too it sometimes. This problem can be overcome. Pine works just fine with all this. It seems to me this is a model which is a leftover from POP3 and just doesn't cut it for local (or IMAP) mail. Is there a chance that you guys will fix this in the future? I would really like to use kmail.... Sincerely Hans -- Hans Ecke hans@ecke.ws Department of Geophysics http://hans.ecke.ws Colorado School of Mines Tel: (USA) 303-273-3733 Golden, Colorado Fax: (USA) 303-273-3478 "Having lost sight of our objectives, we redoubled our efforts." -- Walt Kelly