[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    Bug#2306: marked as done (KDE Style Guide Typo)
From:       owner () bugs ! kde ! org (Stephan Kulow)
Date:       2000-04-16 21:18:01
[Download RAW message or body]

Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2000 14:13:52 -0700
with message-id <00041614135203.21664@wantelbos>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Stephan Kulow
(administrator, KDE bugs database)

Received: (at bugs) by bugs.kde.org; 16 Nov 1999 02:02:10 +0000
From volsung@asu.edu Tue Nov 16 03:02:10 1999
Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu ([129.219.13.100]:60172 "EHLO
        post1.inre.asu.edu") by max.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de with ESMTP
	id <S742382AbPKPCB5>; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 03:01:57 +0100
Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.13.92])
 by asu.edu (PMDF V5.2-31 #31135) with ESMTP id <0FL900PROPMZ2N@asu.edu> for
 bugs@kde.org; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 19:01:47 -0700 (MST)
Received: from asu.edu ([129.219.114.8])	by smtp.asu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3)
 with ESMTP id TAA24582	for <bugs@kde.org>; Mon,
 15 Nov 1999 19:03:28 -0700 (MST)
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 1999 19:04:52 -0700
From:   Stan Seibert <volsung@asu.edu>
Subject: KDE Style Guide Typo
Sender: stan@mx.asu.edu
To:     bugs@kde.org
Message-id: <3830BBC4.66A4D116@asu.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i586)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en
Return-Path: <volsung@asu.edu>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;bugs@kde.org

In file:
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/standards/kde/style/basics/windows.html
there is a typo in the second paragraph of the "Open for discussion" box under
"Pure SDI".

The phrase: ". . . if necessary), effecting no other . . ."
should read: ". . . if necessary), affecting no other . . ."

It's a nitpick, but the usage is currently incorrect.
-- 

Stan Seibert

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]