[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Oxygen] [Bug 337884] Oxygen style glitches under OS X
From:       RJVB <rjvbertin () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-10-08 15:37:18
Message-ID: bug-337884-17878-hXjBVXyilW () http ! bugs ! kde ! org/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337884

--- Comment #30 from RJVB <rjvbertin@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 89051
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=89051&action=edit
systemsettings showing the New Oxygen theme

(In reply to Hugo Pereira Da Costa from comment #24)

> Changes in font size should be unrelated to this change. Meaning: the style
> makes no attempt at changing the size set by Qt, as far as I know and thus
> old and new oxygen should behave the same way. 

OK, so it must have to do with how oxygen-demo works, related also to the fact
that it doesn't follow the theme selection through systemsettings but only
through qtconfig.

> Oxygen being too compact was one of the biggest point of Oxygen's anti,
> during its all lifetime. Hence the move.

Really ... I like it for that, among others. One can always chose larger fonts
to scale up things a bit...

> the style, though admittingly less compact, behave nicely here. 

Well, no reason it wouldn't, but I think that it might not look so nice on a
>15" 1366x768 screen like my gf's laptop ...

> Can you post a screenshot of what you actually see on screen ? 

See the attached picture. What strikes me most is that the tabs are too high
w.r.t. the text in them.

> In any case this would be unrelated to this bug report ... 
Indeed.


> yes. That's what I was trying to explain. I believe the glitches are due to
> improper support for QWidget::setMask on OSX, which, in turn, is what oxygen
> use when compositing is not available ... 
> So I guess one should disable the calls to ->SetMask and the return value of
> SH_MenuMask, getting you "square" menus.

Ok, so I read you backwards. I'll see where that gets me then ...

> > It does give a flatter look though, one that will probably work nicely with
> > OS X 10.10's flatter design.
> 
> I have no clue which "flatness" in the style would be correlated to
> compositingActive

Doesn't switching of compositing support reduce the number of gradients used
(or at least how they're rendered)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]