[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 142196] ooosvn for revision control
From:       "Raúl" <rasasi78 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-02-26 16:33:25
Message-ID: 20070226163325.9070.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142196         




------- Additional Comments From rasasi78 gmail com  2007-02-26 17:33 -------
I strongly support this. Version controlling OpenDocument files is troublesome, \
adding revision control system hooks would be difficult and tedious. A more \
straightforward operation would be having the OpenDocument application do some kind \
of operation like allowing save the file uncompressed, so changes are more easiliy \
tracked.

This latter could be done with koffice easily, but you would have problems opening \
that files within OO.org.

As what OO.org concerns, the ooosvn project seems to fill that hole. My skills \
haven't been enough to understand what it exactly does, but even from the integration \
of bash shell scripting+Basic+openoffice could be a good work, I think that \
combination must not be the best option for an opensource based solution to the \
version control of OpenDocument files.

Yet I think some joint effort should be thought and implemented to solve the issue.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]