[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 139302] incorrect parsing of some RSS feeds
From:       Mathieu Bonnet <mathieu.bonnet () riverside-idealism ! org>
Date:       2006-12-29 21:53:00
Message-ID: 20061229215300.18934.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139302         




------- Additional Comments From mathieu.bonnet riverside-idealism org  2006-12-29 \
22:52 -------
> 
> Neither of the two URLs (beryl or
> tatanka) caused a problem in my Akregator.
> 


Well, I just retried, with "http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/news/feed/", after \
having stopped Akregator and removed the \
"http___www.tatanka.com.br_ies4linux_news_feed_.mk4" archive file (in \
~/kde/share/apps/akregator/Archive), and there is no more date problem, though there \
does not seem to be any change to the feed... (I'll ask the website owner about it, \
just in case).

However, the entries still disappear, when unselecting the feed, and selecting it \
again... Is this intentional, when Akregator is set to only keep x days of archive, \
to remove older items, when you unselect-select the feed, even when you just fetched \
the news? (instead of taking into account the fetch date, it only takes into account, \
the specified date? -well, when a date is specified).

There is still a bug, though... when I select the feed, it says "IEs 4 Linux News \
(4294967286 unread articles)"... (though there is no more article in the article \
list... -and there wasn't even 10 articles ;)). When I restart Akregator, and select \
the feed, it says, properly "no unread articles"...

This might warrant a separate bug report, but it all seems pretty much related to a \
parsing and probably archive problem...


> 
> The newest entries look somewhat like valid entries, but their
> subjects contain partial URLs,
> 
> digbysblog_archive.html#115016467939408795
> Date:Thursday 20 November 2031 10:47 pm 
> 


I don't remember anything like this... In my case, as explained on bug #139043 \
comment 1, the dates were like "2935093-02-24 23:59", or " 00:00", and the order was \
random. I didn't check the content of every articles, but I don't remember anything \
strange... (though the date problem catched my attention, and I might have missed \
other problems...).


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]