[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 115481] Amarok shouldn't open a mail when it crashes
From:       Niels <zorglub_olsen () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2005-11-03 21:46:00
Message-ID: 20051103214600.31906.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115481         




------- Additional Comments From zorglub_olsen hotmail com  2005-11-03 \
22:45 -------
> We need good backtraces, and the stacks for all threads
Then you should enhance the general KDE crash agent, so that all programs \
could benefit. This is basically not-invented-here-syndrome on your part.

> The main reason, though, is that the automatic crash report is much \
> easier to the general user:
The general user probably doesn't understand what the mail is about. Nor \
does he have a KDE with debug enabled or the "enable crash agent" setting \
enabled -- a setting which you choose to ignore. I don't see how this gives \
you usable information from general users. More advanced users are probably \
capable of making a backtrace, or at least manually using a tool you would \
provide.

But the main thing wrong is still that you're trying to force me to report \
a bug. That's a no-no in my opinion. I'm sure the OSS world would cry out \
if Microsoft did what you're doing.

I'm questioning, as I have before, whether Amarok belongs in KDE proper.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]