[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-bugs-dist
Subject: [Bug 69051] reply-to field is ignored (with testcase!)
From: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson () norran ! net>
Date: 2003-11-30 3:00:10
[Download RAW message or body]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69051
roger.larsson@norran.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |major
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From roger.larsson@norran.net 2003-11-30 04:00 -------
This is related to recent additions to bug 21389.
kmail differentiates between ordinary mails and maillists - good.
In this case:
* the sender (or the lists processor - it does not matter)
has defined that replies should go to the list.
* the user has issued command "Reply" (not "Reply to Sender")
but kmail decides that it knows better...
On the other hand:
If the mail contains no Reply-To field but a List
* Then I agree that it should only go to the sender and not the list.
Waldo suggestion is good IMHO:
-----------------
If you want to be anal about this I then I suggest you create "Reply", "Reply
to Sender", "Reply to List" and "Reply to All". Put them all under a single
toolbar button (like the check-mail button) with a simple click resulting in
"Reply". Reply then defaults to "Reply to List" when a list-with-reply-to-set
has been detected and "Reply to Sender" in other cases. Oh, and you can add a
bunch of configuration options to specify how "Reply" should work.
And whatever you do, I suggest you do it right the first time (in KDE 3.2 that
is), instead of delaying it till a later release. There is really no excuse
for asking your users to put up with half thought out stuff for a whole year.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic