[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 41346] paragraph formating - increase/decrease numbering depth
From:       Ferdinand Gassauer <gassauer () kde ! org>
Date:       2003-02-24 13:57:58
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
     
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41346     




------- Additional Comments From gassauer@kde.org  2003-02-24 14:57 -------
Subject: Re:  paragraph formating - increase/decrease numbering depth

On Monday 24 February 2003 12:04, you wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41346
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From faure@kde.org  2003-02-24 12:04 -------
> Subject: Re:  paragraph formating - increase/decrease numbering depth
>
> On Monday 24 February 2003 10:25, you wrote:
> > This is a good thing for highly sophisticated users
> > may be a "suppress parent level digits" hint should be somewhere
> > what confused me is the fact, that not only the parent level digit is
> > suppresed but also the indent.
>
> Which indent? There's no indent related to this dialog page (it's about
> bullets and numbers). I must be missing something.
what I meean is:
1.
1.1.
1.1.1
if only the last digit is shown it is  transformed to
1.
1.
1.
and would be more clear this way. (leading blanks=indent  - problem with 
variable spacing though might make it necessary to replace one digit with 
more than one space) 
1.
  1.
    1.

>
> > There is no chance to "see" what happend to
> > the numbering except of virtualy composing the number like kword does.
> > That's why I suggested to display the complete nubmer somewhere (config
> > dialog and/or tooltip ?)
>
> The preview area at the bottom of the dialog is there for that purpose.
> I believe there's a bug that makes it not show the depth and parent levels,
> I'll try to fix that.
fine
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]