[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-bindings
Subject: End of 2016 update on PyKF5 bindings
From: Shaheed Haque <srhaque () theiet ! org>
Date: 2016-12-27 19:38:20
Message-ID: CAHAc2jd6_r3GsW1+6Uw3DOnYT1xydkSzq+L5QoJHrkx6KnyVdg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Steve and others,
Using a bit of free time, over on github (https://github.com/ShaheedHaque),
I've cued up a few pull requests to get the in-progress PyKF5 bindings
building on my system by:
1. Adding some dependency documentation
2. Debugging/fixing some issues to do with function parameters with
default values
- Sometimes, such default values were just dropped
- When I fixed that, I needed to add back some explicit scoping
3. Fixed one of the unit tests
4. There is one issue I have worked around, as I am unsure of the
correct fix. I've added notes on the workaround to the existing
https://github.com/steveire/frameworks-bindings/issues/3.
With that, I am able to run the various tests in your excellent
documentation. If we can get the PRs merged, and work out item 4 above,
what else might be needed to getting this into production?
Thanks, Shaheed
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Steve and others,<br><br>Using a bit of free time, over on \
github (<a href="https://github.com/ShaheedHaque">https://github.com/ShaheedHaque</a>), \
I've cued up a few pull requests to get the in-progress PyKF5 bindings building \
on my system by:<br><ol><li>Adding some dependency \
documentation</li><li>Debugging/fixing some issues to do with function parameters \
with default values</li><ul><li>Sometimes, such default values were just \
dropped</li><li>When I fixed that, I needed to add back some explicit \
scoping</li></ul><li>Fixed one of the unit tests</li><li>There is one issue I have \
worked around, as I am unsure of the correct fix. I've added notes on the \
workaround to the existing <a \
href="https://github.com/steveire/frameworks-bindings/issues/3">https://github.com/steveire/frameworks-bindings/issues/3</a>.<br></li></ol>With \
that, I am able to run the various tests in your excellent documentation. If we can \
get the PRs merged, and work out item 4 above, what else might be needed to getting \
this into production?<br><br></div>Thanks, Shaheed<br></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic