[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bindings
Subject:    Re: [Kde-bindings] PerlQt constructor syntax
From:       Richard Dale <rdale () foton ! es>
Date:       2009-05-27 9:29:41
Message-ID: 200905271029.42248.rdale () foton ! es
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 27 May 2009 06:24:04 am Chris Burel wrote:
> I originally sent this directly to who I believe are the authors of
> PerlQt3, Ashley Winters and Germain Garand.  But I figured someone on
> the kde-bindings list might have some input on this as well.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Burel <chrisburel@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:36 PM
> Subject: PerlQt constructor syntax
>
> There's a pretty lengthy discussion going on right now on perl's
> module-writers list about the syntax of a new Qt4 module.  You can see
> it here:
> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2009/05/msg7591.html
I don't have an opinion about the Perl constructor syntax one way or another, 
but to me the suggestion to name the classes like 'Qt4::PushButton' instead of 
Qt::PushButton is really ugly.

It's great to see that the Qt4 version of PerlQt is picking up steam anyway. 
Do you think that anyone would be doing a KDE version? If so, it would be 
really nice to have the PerlQt and PerlKDE projects in the kdebindings svn, as 
then we would have 4 different Smoke based bindings there and it would be 
easier to coordinate the projects when we were improving the Smoke libs.

-- Richard
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]