[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bindings
Subject:    [Kde-bindings] Splitting up the SMOKE library
From:       Arno Rehn <arno () arnorehn ! de>
Date:       2007-07-15 11:56:07
Message-ID: 200707151356.07699.arno () arnorehn ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

I just thought about splitting the SMOKE libraries, so that SmokeKDE would 
only contain the KDE classes, SmokeQsci only QScintilla classes etc., because 
at the moment it is rather ugly that we need to have all the Qt classes again 
in SmokeKDE and can't split Qwt and QScintilla from SmokeQt.
In theory it is quite simple and I think I have something like a concept. 
However it would require one or more changes in the API of Smoke, so we also 
would have to update the sources of all the bindings that depend on Smoke.
The one change that will probably affect most parts of the bindings is that 
I'd plan to make Smoke::Index a struct that looks like

struct Index { 
	short index;
	Smoke *smoke;
};

What do you think of splitting up Smoke? If you want to, I can give more 
details on what I would do to split it up and make it work correctly.

-- 
Arno Rehn
arno@arnorehn.de
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]