On Monday 20 November 2006 20:17, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> > Sounds good to me, but I don't really have much opinion either way. What
> > about lightweight scripting projects for dbus like we had for dcop -
> > should they go in a separate 'dbus-scriptiing' directory or under
> > kdebindings/ruby, kdebindings/python etc?
>
> I think so, yes.  Mostly I think what annoyed me the most about the way
> things were is that configure checks for lots of extra stuff that isn't
> necessary if you're only building one set of bindings.  For example, I
> don't need it to search for a C# compiler if I'm just installing QtRuby. 
> Those specific checks can be in the individual subdirectory, so you can
> install the project for the language of your choice.
OK lets do it this way then. I think we should include the lightweight dbus 
scripting bindings (if anyone writes them) under kdebindings/ruby, 
kdebindings/python etc

-- Richard
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings