> Sounds good to me, but I don't really have much opinion either way. What
> about lightweight scripting projects for dbus like we had for dcop - should
> they go in a separate 'dbus-scriptiing' directory or under
> kdebindings/ruby, kdebindings/python etc?

I think so, yes.  Mostly I think what annoyed me the most about the way things 
were is that configure checks for lots of extra stuff that isn't necessary if 
you're only building one set of bindings.  For example, I don't need it to 
search for a C# compiler if I'm just installing QtRuby.  Those specific 
checks can be in the individual subdirectory, so you can install the project 
for the language of your choice.

Caleb
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings