From kde-bindings  Sat Jun 10 01:16:15 2006
From: Marcus <mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:16:15 +0000
To: kde-bindings
Subject: Re: [Kde-bindings] playground/bindings/kimono
Message-Id: <200606092016.15733.mathpup () mylinuxisp ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-bindings&m=114990214830711

Some things that can be done with Qt signals and slots cannot be done with C# 
events.


On Friday 09 June 2006 8:57 am, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 17:18, Paolo Capriotti wrote:
> > This is great! We do have to polish the interface a little bit, but
> > the hardest work is done.
>
> BTW, I passed along this great news to the guys hanging around in the #mono
> channel on IRC. While it was generally praised, there was some criticism of
> not using the C# event feature.
>
> Is the SIGNAL/SLOT system used to maintain compatibility with the existing
> Qt docs? How hard will it be to get the C++ method signature to be optional
> (might help with making the code samples prettier)?
_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
Kde-bindings@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings