From kde-artists Mon May 12 21:18:09 2008 From: Jakob Petsovits Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:18:09 +0000 To: kde-artists Subject: Re: [kde-artists] Missing Oxygen icons (for Okular) Message-Id: <200805122318.09431.jpetso () gmx ! at> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-artists&m=121062714604196 On Monday, 12. May 2008, James Richard Tyrer wrote: > I find that Okular also needs the other icons I listed on: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/icon-naming-spec/to-be-named > > zoom As you already noticed (discussion in the other thread), I committed this one as page-zoom. > Then there are the icons I listed as: > > view-next > view-previous > [snip] > It is possible that it would be better to name the icons: > > go-next-view > go-previous-view > > so that they would be part of a fallback tree. go-next-[whatever] is indeed the scheme that I would prefer for this. However, the next/previous action switches not between views but between documents or any kind of content, just like the forward/back action does. So I currently have two major problems (challenges?) with these icons: a) Need to find an accurate suffix that indicates that it is used for navigation in an ordered list, as opposed to history navigation that go-next and go-previous are targeting. b) There are already two sets of arrow icons in KDE: arrow-* and go-*. The former are of course a misnomer, but I didn't manage to sort that out in time for the 4.0 release. Those have traditionally been used for next/previous on the one hand, and "move" on the other hand. Different things really, deserving different icons. With go-next-[whatever] for "order navigation", KDE would have three different sets of arrow icons. Is that feasible or even a reasonable thing to do? Should we expect 3rd party themers to come up with a three different ideas of arrows, for three different purposes? Artists, what do you think? (Remark: There might even be a fourth set for stuff like expand/contract, like for Kate's search bar or the "More options / Less options" stuff in the printer dialog, or Adept's package list. I don't know how many different arrows can be healthy for an icon set.) > I also noted that we don't have a "view-sidepanel" icon so Okular is > using the wrong one. That's right. ______________________________________________________________________________ kde-artists@kde.org | https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists