On Thursday 15 January 2004 19:06, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Ante Wessels writes:
> > If you distribute the png, then that is the source, legally.
>
> OK, it is too tempting.  Can you please re-read the license, because
> according to the definitions in the LGPL, the .png's you distribute
> are not "the source".  I quote: '"Source code" for a work means the
> preferred form of the work for making modifications to it.'
>
> And now this is officially my last contribution to the thread, and I
> do mean it this time.

ante, i'm sorry, but imho dominique is right at this point.

greetings, luci
-- 

:.. :.: ::: :
luci(ash [graun]d' being) :.:::.::. ::.:::  :: :: :  :.:.::
simply just an( )other web designer? :::::.::.:.:::.:::  :.: :
l u c i [ a t ] s h . g r o u n d . c z ::.:::..:::.::.::.::  :.  ::
c. p#one ++ 420 777 777 590 :::.::::..::.:::  ::   : :.: ::      
http://www.ground.cz ::.:::...:.: :  .::  ::.: ::  :::
:.. :.: ::: :

_______________________________________________
kde-artists mailing list
kde-artists@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-artists