[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-active
Subject:    Re: Re: kwin vs kwinactive
From:       Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-11-02 14:28:56
Message-ID: 22164119.VmqOaEvkZW () martin-desktop
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 02 November 2012 12:27:39 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be shipping rules
> > > for active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo
> > > where things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what
> > > motivated his mail.
> > 
> > ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. Especially if
> > the rules are useless for the desktop case.
> 
> so in the end how do we proceed for now?
> in any way to me is fine, using kwinactiverulesrc or kwinrulesrc
if you want to ship rules in active, I think it would make sense to create a 
${KWIN_NAME}rulesrc
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]