[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-active
Subject:    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFJlOiBrd2luIHZzIGt3aW5hY3RpdmU=?=
From:       Thomas Lübking <thomas.luebking () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-10-30 19:41:35
Message-ID: 8b844217-7cb0-4c60-97ef-c7c6472fbbb6 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Dienstag, 30. Oktober 2012 19:42:46 CEST, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2012 21:50:47 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, October 29, 2012 21:11:32 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > On Monday 29 October 2012 20:54:49 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > > hi all,
> > > > i seen that when kwin is built as "kwinactive" executable it takes its
> > > > config from kwinactiverc, but the rules are still taken from
> > > > kwinrulesrc,
> > > > shouldn't it be kwinactiverulesrc as well? (to have different sets, ie
> > > > one
> > > > would want the fullscreen prevention only on kwinactive)
> > > 
> > > we currently do not ship any rules for active and given that the kcm is
> > > not
> > > compiled for kwinactive, I am not sure whether it is needed.
> > 
> > Marco wrote his email because we are probably going to be 
> > shipping rules for
> > active; we ran into an issue with applications written for Nemo where
> > things are done a bit differently. i'm guessing that's what motivated his
> > mail.
> ah yes, then it would make sense to change that part, too. 
> Especially if the rules are useless for the desktop case.

Would we need more generic support here then?
Eg. one might need a rule for plasma-netbook ("yes stupid window, you *can* \
maximize!") which makes no sense on the desktop at all.

Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]