From kde-active Mon Oct 29 11:11:54 2012 From: "Aaron J. Seigo" Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:11:54 +0000 To: kde-active Subject: Re: Talking to users (Re: "Big picture" design one release cycle ahead?) Message-Id: <4426530.AVLLxfSrlb () freedom> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-active&m=135150912617069 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============6875099287248522995==" --===============6875099287248522995== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6634878.gLZX8Dt34b"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --nextPart6634878.gLZX8Dt34b Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Monday, October 29, 2012 11:33:38 Bj=F6rn Balazs wrote: > Now my question: If we do so, we would need to talk to people using a= > certain configuration / version of the software to get the right feed= back > (and people will not be able to tell us the correct version number of= their > software). This is where I drew the idea of dot releases from. Would = this > also be possible when we use the Master branch? yes. --=20 Aaron J. Seigo --nextPart6634878.gLZX8Dt34b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlCOZHoACgkQ1rcusafx20M/EwCcDvp4kqz0ahewHWZYugsRP6Di B10An2k6yJSsOxUZ9UZyTwWhb4VrfFFc =mz3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6634878.gLZX8Dt34b-- --===============6875099287248522995== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active --===============6875099287248522995==--