On 18.09.2012 14:04, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday, September 14, 2012 22:05:20 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
>> The blockers definitely have to be fixed before we can release. I would
>> definitely not recommend releasing with the major problems still there,
>> since it would make us look bad, but they at least leave PA in a usable
>> state.
>
> 2 bits of input here:
>
> a) we don't need the editorial to convince why we should no release with
> "release blockers". :) Let's all just agree that "release blocker" means what
> it says and then decide on an issue-by-issue basis if that issue is a blocker.

Sure. Maybe I should call them "My release blocker candidates" or something like 
that instead, because these were bugs which I personally would not release with, 
but of course that doesn't necessarily mean that the others agree ;)

> b) these should be in a fresh thread for blockers; i'd like to see such a
> thread on the list at this point in every release cycle so we can collect
> issues for killing in an easy to find spot. i'll send an email shortly.

+1000!

_______________________________________________
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active