[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-active
Subject:    Re: qml screenlocker, again
From:       Marco Martin <notmart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-08-21 17:20:08
Message-ID: 201208211920.08347.notmart () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 21 August 2012, Martin Gr=E4=DFlin wrote:
> > i think the timeout is still (partly) governed by the screensaver
> > timeout, so without that kcm wouldn't make much sense, should be
> > uniquely powermanagement governed timeouts?
> =

> sounds reasonable to move it to powermanagement
> =

> > oh, another thing.. what about widgets on screensaver? is something that
> > we really want to keep?
> =

> should still work, IIRC I adjusted it. Personally I would like to have it
> as the default, but it's too slow in loading.

yeah, i see.
when asked to close the locker from the toolbox, it seems to try to load it=
s =

own piece of qml for authentication (going to a black screen, btw)

doesn't this leads to a potential duplicated implementation of the whole =

greeter?

-- =

Marco Martin
_______________________________________________
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]