From kde-active Mon Jul 23 14:27:40 2012 From: "Lamarque V. Souza" Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:27:40 +0000 To: kde-active Subject: Re: RFC: depend from Nepomuk2 Message-Id: <201207231127.40171.Lamarque.Souza.ext () basyskom ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-active&m=134305393802094 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============5330411419763998813==" --===============5330411419763998813== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_c9VDQ+HBBT+aUZk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Boundary-01=_c9VDQ+HBBT+aUZk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em Monday 23 July 2012, Marco Martin escreveu: > Hi all, > in some branches around (uin nepomuk-core, plasma-mobile, share-like- > connect..) there is a working port of all stuff in plasma-active to > nepomuk2. > > it's quite well tested and would be time to merge, however, would mean pa3 > will not be able to depend from 4.9, but again needing pieces of master (i > personally think is not much avoidable anyways). > > is ok for everybody to satart to depend from nepomuk2 in plasma-device& co? > (means also merging the rcgen branch in nepomuk-core) > > comments? ideas? What does still need to be ported to nepomuk2? Well, if moving to nepomuk2 also means better performance I think we should go ahead. -- Lamarque V. Souza http://www.basyskom.com/ --Boundary-01=_c9VDQ+HBBT+aUZk Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Em Monday 23 July 2012, Marco Martin escreveu:

> Hi all,

> in some branches around (uin nepomuk-core, plasma-mobile, share-like-

> connect..) there is a working port of all stuff in plasma-active to

> nepomuk2.

>

> it's quite well tested and would be time to merge, however, would mean pa3

> will not be able to depend from 4.9, but again needing pieces of master (i

> personally think is not much avoidable anyways).

>

> is ok for everybody to satart to depend from nepomuk2 in plasma-device& co?

> (means also merging the rcgen branch in nepomuk-core)

>

> comments? ideas?

 

What does still need to be ported to nepomuk2? Well, if moving to nepomuk2 also means better performance I think we should go ahead.

 

--

Lamarque V. Souza

http://www.basyskom.com/

--Boundary-01=_c9VDQ+HBBT+aUZk-- --===============5330411419763998813== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active --===============5330411419763998813==--