On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Cukic wrote: > >> i would go for either the first or second option for now.. > > For now, I'd go for 2 - seems less hassle than the two others. > > The third one is something that we should do at some point as well. in the end gone for the one that i think is the most elegant: rewritten the apps dataengine to be a bit more efficient and to be flexible enough to do what i need, in that dialog -and- in the applications launcher, that will be ported to that as well. will write a krunner dataengine as well, this will make possible to have the application launcher as pure qml (and probably a simple package rather than a plasmoid/containment) yay for less C++ ;) Cheers, Marco MArtin