[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-active
Subject:    Contour Design Concept - Activity Switcher
From:       sebas () kde ! org (Sebastian =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCgler?=)
Date:       2011-06-16 10:07:37
Message-ID: 201106161207.38087.sebas () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 17:56:36 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011, Ivan Cukic wrote:
> > > Yes, actually I would prefer the auto stashing idea. I thought that
> > > activities, that are not used for a really long time, are out of focus
> > 
> > The problem with 'we'll hide them till the user searches for them' is
> > that it is not obvious (at all) that they are hidden, and not
> > non-existent.
> > 
> > Just imagine opening a file browser, it shows only 5. Where are all my
> > files, you'll ask :)
> > 
> > There needs to be a 'show all' activities section.
> > 
> > Ch
> 
> or the stashed could just be semi transparent, filtering would just be done
> by name

But the stashing is an implementation detail, which should not be known to the 
user. She doesn't care if an unused activity is active or stashed...
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]