[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-accessibility
Subject:    Re: [Kde-accessibility] Starting to maintain kdeaccessibility
From:       Gunnar Schmi Dt <gunnar () schmi-dt ! de>
Date:       2003-01-10 8:06:45
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello Pupeno,

> [...]
> 
> On Monday 06 January 2003 07:48, Gunnar Schmi Dt wrote:
> > I think it would be good to have some basic rules for maintaining. My
> > proposal is the following:
> > 1) If we are both there, it is ok if one of us decides and the other one
> > does not disagree within a certain time (for example one week?)
> > 2) If one of us is absent the other one makes the decisions.
> > 3) Absense needs to be anounced for example by a mail to the other one.
>
> I'll add to the last one, that lack of replies/answers/responses should be
> taken as absense depending in the priority of the desition (ergo, I may be
> off line at any time without previous warning, if that happens, just go
> on).
>[...]

I would like to have the fourth rule a bit clearer. How about this:
4) If one of us does not reply/answer/respond within one week (the same time 
as within rule 1), it is not only regarded as a "not disagree" but also as a 
not anounced absence, i.e., all waiting decisions can thereafter be done by 
the other co-maintainer.

We might reduce the "one week" to a shorter time.

Gunnar Schmi Dt
_______________________________________________
kde-accessibility mailing list
kde-accessibility@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-accessibility
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]