[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde
Subject:    Re: Status Report?
From:       Henry Stern <stern () cs ! dal ! ca>
Date:       1999-08-08 16:34:00
[Download RAW message or body]

Troy,
Do you have any idea what you're talking about?  Have you even checked out the
CVS code for KDE 2.0?  What "errors" are you talking about?  If you really want
to use KDE 2.0 right now, give it a try, it's getting there.  You may like to
know that one of these "new features" involves cutting memory consumption of
KDE, a smaller version of mico.  KDE 2.0 has ALWAYS compiled decently, so long
as you have a brain.

Better be careful about throwing around your 2c... you may run out.
Henry Stern

On Sun, 08 Aug 1999, Troy Unrau wrote:
>What is the current development status of KDE 1.x and KDE 2.  Does KDE2
>compile properly and run semi-decently yet, or are you guys overlooking the
>fact that you should fix the errors BEFORE adding new features?  In my
>opinion, you should finish working on half-implemented features and fix the
>bugs, and save the extras for a 2.1 release or later in 2.0 beta.
>
>I'm not saying a code fork is the solution, but perhaps table the addition
>of new features and solidify the present ones to put a KDE 2 beta out, after
>which point you can add more feature without having the bugfix /everything/.
>
>Just my two Canadian cents (1.31 US cents; damned exchange!)
>
>Troy
-- 
Send posts to:  kde@lists.netcentral.net
 Send all commands to:  kde-request@lists.netcentral.net
  Put your command in the SUBJECT of the message:
   "subscribe", "unsubscribe", "set digest on", or "set digest off"
PLEASE READ THE ARCHIVED MESSAGES AT http://lists.kde.org/ BEFORE POSTING
**********************************************************************
This list is from your pals at NetCentral <http://www.netcentral.net/>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]