> > What the heck are we doing here? > > Users start to complain for too much configurability :-( > > the mac-like menubar is a result of the hard work of many developers which > anyways answered to a lot of users request. It is an unique feature in > Unix, and users coming from Mac seem to love it very much. > > Understading that such a feature isn't to the likes of anybody, the > developers made it configurable. One can use it or not, to its like. > > Users arguing on the (lack of) usefulness of a feature they don't like > (*and* they're not forced to use) are just loosing their times. Ough!!! Sorry, next time I'll think twice before opening my mouth (or my keyboard). :-) Obviously, I haven't browsed enough KDE conf options. I had never seen/noticed the Mac/W95 option. That's why I asked if it was a KDE 2.0 feature. After the first answer saying that it was configureable, I had enough. But apparently, somebody has taken it personal and thought that I was complaining, blaming developers, ... Just for the record, I LOVE KDE, I think this is the greatest thing since paella (Spanish I am, yes) and I support KDE developers 1E50 %. This list is getting quite violent lately. When finally all this RedHat thing was calming down, the fire can start up again in another flamethread. I hope that this will not get any further (in this or any other thread). KDE is waaaaaaay over all this stuff. I know that we all need our summer holidays (at least in the northern half of the world) same as I do but, please, stay on your feet. Santiago -- Send posts to: kde@lists.netcentral.net Send all commands to: kde-request@lists.netcentral.net Put your command in the SUBJECT of the message: "subscribe", "unsubscribe", "set digest on", or "set digest off" PLEASE READ THE ARCHIVED MESSAGES AT http://lists.kde.org/ BEFORE POSTING ********************************************************************** This list is from your pals at NetCentral