[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde
Subject:    Re: [kde] Yet another failed KDE release?
From:       "dE ." <de.techno () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-19 16:48:56
Message-ID: CADofXPB5MFzQDOd+UUPK=TprtpJ2icgja7iD5Y5UVEVdSZ-yfQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/related)]

[Attachment #4 (multipart/alternative)]


On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dE . <de.techno@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Renaud (Ron) Olgiati <
> renaud@olgiati-in-paraguay.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 24 Mar 2013 11:41 my mailbox was graced by a message from Kevin
>> Krammer who wrote:
>> > For example, if we look at KMail, one can easily fall into the trap of
>> > thinking of it as just an program for writing and reading emails and
>> thus
>> > compare it too closely with other products that do that but only that.
>>
>> > However, if one considers the additional requirements, it becomes often
>> > quickly obvious that other product's features for those requirements are
>> > either quite crude or not existant at all.
>>
>> Thank $DEITY the other products do not, or they would be bloatware in the
>> same
>> way Kmail has become.
>>
>> For a test, install any distribution without KDE, then try to install
>> Kmail,
>> and see how many Mb you have to install....
>>
>> Given that most users only need a simple email client, with attached
>> addressbook, what about a Kmail-lite, that would be smaller, faster and
>> simpler, for those users who do not feel the need to have a complete
>> petrochemical works for preparing a cup of tea....
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ron.
>>
>
> It's perfectly OK to add new features, cause you should listen to
> everyone's advice and try to make everyone happy.
>
> Even if it's blotware, if things work OK for simple requirements (that's
> not the case with Kmail), then what's wrong?
>

Anyone still interested? [?]

[Attachment #7 (text/html)]

<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dE . <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:de.techno@gmail.com" target="_blank">de.techno@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Sun, \
Mar 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Renaud (Ron) Olgiati <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:renaud@olgiati-in-paraguay.org" \
target="_blank">renaud@olgiati-in-paraguay.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sunday 24 Mar 2013 11:41 my mailbox was graced by a \
message from Kevin<br> <div>Krammer who wrote:<br>
&gt; For example, if we look at KMail, one can easily fall into the trap of<br>
&gt; thinking of it as just an program for writing and reading emails and thus<br>
&gt; compare it too closely with other products that do that but only that.<br>
<br>
&gt; However, if one considers the additional requirements, it becomes often<br>
&gt; quickly obvious that other product&#39;s features for those requirements are<br>
&gt; either quite crude or not existant at all.<br>
<br>
</div>Thank $DEITY the other products do not, or they would be bloatware in the \
same<br> way Kmail has become.<br>
<br>
For a test, install any distribution without KDE, then try to install Kmail,<br>
and see how many Mb you have to install....<br>
<br>
Given that most users only need a simple email client, with attached<br>
addressbook, what about a Kmail-lite, that would be smaller, faster and<br>
simpler, for those users who do not feel the need to have a complete<br>
petrochemical works for preparing a cup of tea....<br>
<div><br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Ron.<br></div></blockquote></div><div><br>It&#39;s perfectly OK to add new features, \
cause you should listen to everyone&#39;s advice and try to make everyone \
happy.<br><br>Even if it&#39;s blotware, if things work OK for simple requirements \
(that&#39;s not the case with Kmail), then what&#39;s wrong?<br>

</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>Anyone still interested? <img goomoji="gtalk.335" \
style="margin: 0px 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle;" \
src="cid:gtalk.335@goomoji.gmail"><br>

--047d7b5d8823d6656004dab97bc6--


["335.png" (image/png)]

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic