[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde
Subject:    Re: [kde] Why GTK+ will prevail, and what needs to be done
From:       s s <greatredshark () yahoo ! ca>
Date:       2005-01-29 4:15:35
Message-ID: 20050129041535.67204.qmail () web50908 ! mail ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


> Actually I just had another thought on this; Isn't
> Gtk just a C toolkit
> and not an OO C++ kit like qt?
> If so and I think that is the case wouldn't it be at
> least an order of
> magnitude harder to port from an Object-Oriented C++
> toolkit to a non OO
> C kit than to annother OO C++ toolkit like qt?  It
> seems to me that you
> would have to start almost from scratch. 
> 
>
Porting code directly from OO to non-OO might be hard,
but maybe if it was planned carefully and a general
method for mapping between OO and non-OO was
investigated beforehand, it might not be so scary.

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]