[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kc-kde
Subject:    [kc-kde] Summary for this week.
From:       "Timothy R. Butler" <tbutler () uninetsolutions ! com>
Date:       2001-12-23 20:18:03
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,
  I have attached this week's summary for the kwrite-devel list. 

  Merry Christmas everyone!

  -Tim

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy R. Butler | Universal  Networks | http://www.uninet.info
tbutler@uninetsolutions.com          ICQ: 12495932 AIM: Uninettm
Christian Portal and Search Tool:       http://www.faithtree.com
Open Source Migration Guide:                  http://www.ofb.biz
============= "Christian Web Services Since 1996" ==============
["kc 2001.12.23.xml" (text/html)]

<section
     title="Exporting 'Syntax Enlightened Source'"
     author="Timothy R. Butler"
     email="tbutler@uninetsolutions.com"
     subject="[Kwrite-devel] [PATCH] nice feature for kate.."
     archive="http://lists.kde.org/?l=kwrite-devel&m=100846980623391&w=2"
     posts="16"
     startdate="Sun, 16 Dec 2001 03:31:14 -0500"
     enddate="Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:58:59 -0500"
 >

In an effort to add a feature he discovered in VI to Kate, <a \
href="mailto:emmanuel.touzery@wanadoo.fr">Emmanuel Touzery</a> posted a note \
saying:<quote who=Emmanuel Touzery>

        Recently i discovered a nice feature from vim: export a syntax enlightened
source in HTML.. great isn't it? i wrote a method for KateDocument that does
that (it requires information that you can't have in a plugin).<br /><br />

        IMHO, and if you decide to take it in, the export to HTML should go in the
submenu where you can choose the enlightenment mode (document->syntax
enlightening). Also, a potential improvement would be to export the selection
or the whole document, depending on the user's will, but I don't have the
time for this at the moment... maybe soon :o)
</quote><br />

<a href="mailto:daniel.naber@t-online.de">Daniel Naber</a> responded <quote \
who=Daniel Naber>Very cool! However, your version currently produces invalid XHTML, \
i.e. it's not well-fomed. There's e.g. "&lt;font ...&gt;&lt;/i&gt;" in your \
patch.html.</quote> After a quick exchange of messages, Emmanuel replied <quote \
who=Emmanuel Touzery>here we are. the attached html file is XHTML-1.0 compliant \
according to validator.w3.org (tell me if there's still anything wrong, though), and \
you also have the relevant sources.</quote> Daniel finished up the discussion saying \
<quote who=Daniel Naber>Ok, I assume Jospeh is going to commit it to HEAD.</quote>

</section>


_______________________________________________
kc-kde mailing list
kc-kde@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kc-kde

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]