[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       juniper-nsp
Subject:    Re: [j-nsp] Silly command?
From:       Jared Mauch <jared () puck ! nether ! net>
Date:       2019-03-19 15:51:12
Message-ID: 5D2AE4F3-8D96-49A7-9711-22A2702EF974 () puck ! nether ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

We've also had to set various commands like:

Chassis { fpc 0 pic 0 port 0 
                channel-speed disable-auto-speed-detection;
}

Depending on the hardware used.  This is seen with some cables that can do 4x25 or \
1x100g based on how the framer is set.

- Jared


> On Mar 18, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Eric Krichbaum <eric@telic.us> wrote:
> 
> I like them.  100G FS DAC between a pair works well in 17, not so much in 18
> code (although I didn't try disabling auto negotiation, which is a quirk
> with the 4300/5100 sometimes).  I gave up early on about not hard setting
> the interfaces.  Never worked for me until I did that.  BGP did as expected.
> 
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 0 tunnel-services bandwidth 200g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 0 port 0 speed 100g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 0 port 1 speed 40g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 0 port 2 speed 40g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 0 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 1 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 2 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 3 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 4 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 5 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 6 speed 10g
> set chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 7 speed 10g
> 
> IS-IS, VRRP work well. There is a behavior change between 17.1 and 17.2 for
> the firewall filter (stopped VRRP in 17.2 without a rule that 17.1 did not
> require).  I'm not doing anything crazy with the boxes in general but
> they're working well for the 8 I put in.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Aaron
> Gould
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 3:57 PM
> To: 'Chris Adams' <cma@cmadams.net>; 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'Chris Adams'
> <cmaatcmadams.net@dilbert.slimey.org>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Silly command?
> 
> How did you like the MX204 ?  How much testing did you do?
> 
> I have one now, just received it on Friday, and I have it in the lab.
> 
> I'm currently just testing a few things...
> 
> ospf
> mpls
> ldp
> vrf
> bridge-domain
> multiple different vlan tags on same physical interface with different tags
> on different units (subinterfaces)
> 
> all seems good at this point
> 
> The interfaces were interesting trying to get those up...
> 
> I had to set chassis fpc speed for all of them pic 0 and pic 1 to get a 40
> gig interface on pic 0 to work (bounce pic's... request chassis fpc pic etc
> offline... then online)
> 
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]