[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104
From: Raphael Maunier <raphael () zoreole ! com>
Date: 2017-12-02 16:04:43
Message-ID: BB682BD7-0A37-4F59-97F5-4BD29C1EE82C () zoreole ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
You can split the 100G port in order to to 4*10G ( with a 40G qfsp )
So you can do a 24*10G router if you don't need the 100G (
Raphael
PS : New remote is ordered ( I used the Juniper Repair kit to fix the previous one ^^
On 02/12/2017 17:02, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael Mazelier" \
<juniper-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of raph@futomaki.net> wrote:
On 02/12/2017 16:26, Raphael Maunier wrote:
> There is no licence for the ports, I already made my first quote for a customer \
last week on this product > Rebate are also lower not the same than the MX chassis.
>
> It's not the same product, only 10G/100G, no interfaces cards, no services \
cards … >
> This is the best MX product for years, I'm glad to see Juniper listening to \
their partner and finally decided to build this version ( >
Hi Raphael,
This is indeed an interesting product and I'm thinking it could be a
good candidate for replacing my old edge devices on my CDN
infrastructure. A real router, a good density and the Junos toolbox on
1U. Sound good on the paper.
What are the port details ? 8x10G ports and 4x100/40/10G which can be
spitted ?
Best,
PS : can you give me some price detail in pv ?
PS2 : How about your remote ? :)
--
Raphael Mazelier
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic