[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       juniper-nsp
Subject:    Re: [j-nsp] Anyone uses Adaptive Load Balancing?
From:       "Alex K." <nsp.lists () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-11-28 18:09:32
Message-ID: CAA0bn6MhsGOC9kmPH=esAN4OeF+DQAFgK4QWBh-dewMmvoSN2w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello Daniel,

Thank you. My scenario close to yours, hence I glad to know this thing
really works.

Alex.

בתאריך 25 ב� וב' 2017 9:36 AM,‏ "Daniel Rohan" <drohan@gmail.com> כתב:

Same.  Worked fine on 4x10Gb ring with large research flows.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Michael Hare <michael.hare@wisc.edu> wrote:

> Alex-
>
> I've used it AS wide in 14.1 for ~2+ years without observing any negative
> side effects.  My main driver was a connector's SAN replication MPLS
> service across an Nx10 bundle mixed with regular IP traffic with the SAN
> wanting to be one big flow.
>
> -Michael
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> >>Of Alex K.
> >>Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 1:09 AM
> >>To: serge vautour <sergervautour@gmail.com>
> >>Cc: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> >>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Anyone uses Adaptive Load Balancing?
> >>
> >>Hello Serge and thank you.
> >>
> >>Yes, there are indeed, not that many cases for ALB. That's why I turned
> to
> >>community.
> >>
> >>Thank you for sharing your experience.
> >>
> >>בתאריך 18 ב� וב' 2017 1:41 AM,‏ "serge vautour"
> >><sergervautour@gmail.com>
> >>כתב:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> We have been using it for a while. Works great. We have a few small
> links
> >>> in a LAG bundle with a small number of fat flows over them. Without
> >>> adaptive LAG the flows would sometimes hash on the same link. With
> >>adaptive
> >>> LAG they are always split.
> >>>
> >>> I agree that there probably aren't many use cases for this. We ran into
> >>> one and this solution worked.
> >>>
> >>> Serge
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Alex K. <nsp.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> A customer of mine, is looking forward for a technology able to load
> >>>> balance a traffic across a LAG.
> >>>>
> >>>> The LAG in question comprised of Ethernet link and can grow from a few
> >>>> links (4) to say, 20 - as required bandwidth grows. The gear is MX
> boxes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since I'm familiar with adaptive load balancing but never used it
> myself,
> >>>> I'll glad if someone here can share his/her experience using it? Can
> it
> >>>> deliver pretty good load balancing across a LAG between routers? Is it
> >>>> stable? Is there any caveats one should avoid? Anything else we should
> >>>> consider, before deploying this thing into production? Feel free to
> share
> >>>> (off list/on list) your experience and everything else you think
> relevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]