[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       juniper-nsp
Subject:    Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001
From:       Jared Mauch <jared () puck ! nether ! net>
Date:       2017-11-12 15:20:21
Message-ID: 8C0B4375-AAF8-4EF4-8CE9-6F7655123D65 () puck ! nether ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account team \
for the latest. 

Jared Mauch

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton <sf@lists.esoteric.ca> wrote:
> 
> Jason,
> 
> For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80.  I'd look at the MX204 for a \
> bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break out cables \
> are an option for adding lower speed interfaces. 
> -- Stephen
> 
> > On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> > Hey there,
> > I'm looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit \
> > that's out there. For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP \
> > BGP-Free P Core LSR.  QFX5110 seem to be closest.  Fair? For a NCS5501-SE \
> > comparison, the use case would be for a peering router with a big FIB, ISIS, LDP \
> > and MP-BGP.  I'm having a hard time finding a comparison in the same form factor. \
> > Is there one? Finally, for the ASR9001 comparison, the use case would be the same \
> > as the NCS5001-SE case, but for much, much smaller sites.  On paper, it looks as \
> > though the MX80 would be the direct comparison here? Thanks folks!
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]