[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       juniper-nsp
Subject:    Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences?
From:       "Erdem Sener" <erdems () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-05-28 13:06:31
Message-ID: 392c91050805280606j2d37d247i8b40ba8e7ee8de36 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Matthew,

 CDP, along with other Cisco proprietary protocols, is treated as a
multicast packet and forwarded to all the ports
within the vlan on EX boxes. It obviosly is not originated and/or terminated.

 HTH
 Erdem



On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:55 AM, matthew zeier <mrz@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I'm looking at the EX4200 as an alternative to Cisco's 3750G.  The
> EX4200 is much less expensive than a comparable 3750G.
>
> Current network is all Cisco and I don't have any experience dealing
> with Juniper support outside of a couple SSG-5 issues.  I think the
> largest barrier to Juniper is their support is an unknown and no one
> wants a Cisco/Juniper finger pointing match when there's some problem.
>
> Looking for real work experience with Juniper support (and even with the
> EX4200s, as new as they are).
>
> Oh, and Juniper doesn't do VTP or CDP (or Cisco doesn't do LLDP)!
>
> --
> matthew zeier | Network Engineer | Mozilla Corp. | (650)903-0800 x219
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]