[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       juddi-dev
Subject:    [jira] Created: (JUDDI-51) juddi/function/SaveServiceFunction pb while trying to save multiple objec
From:       "Mathieu Peltier (JIRA)" <juddi-dev () ws ! apache ! org>
Date:       2005-01-21 16:18:18
Message-ID: 1032062307.1106324298526.JavaMail.jira () ajax ! apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

juddi/function/SaveServiceFunction pb while trying to save multiple objects?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: JUDDI-51
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-51
     Project: jUDDI
        Type: Bug
 Environment: Latest jUDDI CVS version (2005-01-21) deployed in JOnAS
    Reporter: Mathieu Peltier
 Assigned to: Steve Viens 


In ws-juddi/src/java/org/apache/juddi/function/SaveServiceFunction.java: it seems \
that, when a ServiceKey is specified, the validity of this service key can not be \
checked by only calling the dataStore.isValidServiceKey(serviceKey) method.

While trying to save multiple objects (eg a BusinessEntity and a BusinessService) in \
the registry using the saveObjects(ArrayList) method, the service may have been \
removed if the business entity contains it and was already contained in the registry \
(see datastore.deleteBusiness(String businessKey) method which deletes the \
BusinessEntity's Services and dependents).

A work around is just to comment the following lines (but of course I guess this is \
not sufficient):

if (((serviceKey != null) && (serviceKey.length() > 0)) && \
(!dataStore.isValidServiceKey(serviceKey)))  throw new \
InvalidKeyPassedException("serviceKey="+serviceKey);


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]