[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jpackage-discuss
Subject:    Re: [JPackage-discuss] [JPackage-announce]
From:       David Walluck <david () zarb ! org>
Date:       2006-07-20 19:05:57
Message-ID: 44BFD415.10201 () zarb ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gary Benson wrote:
> How bizarre.  Why didn't they just require that "Name:", "Version":
> and "Release:" be the first three lines of the specfile if that's what
> they were trying to acheive?

I don't know. This was probably already the case, as well.

But, I still don't understand why if this causes some problem with
somebody's build tools they just don't fix the tools instead of
rewriting all these spec files.

- --
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<david@zarb.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEv9QVN5thZBYlTwkRAvFAAJ9FDDlnVV2g1qbN1uaj9idJfxgSmwCdFyp4
LMDm93Kx4vAAgEanEDPmWWc=
=kY7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
JPackage-discuss@zarb.org
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]