[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jpackage-discuss
Subject:    Re: [JPackage-discuss] JRE anyone?
From:       R.Apel () t-systems ! com
Date:       2006-07-17 7:20:11
Message-ID: C56F9F71ADBEFC48A810CECFCDF6F02809A462 () S4DE8PSAABE ! t-systems ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Any of the java-1.X.Y-vendor-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.nosrc.rpm, when built, produces up to the following packages:

java-1.X.Y-vendor-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-alsa-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
(java-1.X.Y-vendor-console-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm)
java-1.X.Y-vendor-demo-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-devel-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-fonts-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-jdbc-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-src-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm

The first of these packages is the JRE, i.e. java-1.X.Y-vendor-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm.
The JDK add-on is java-1.X.Y-vendor-devel-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm and obviously requires the JRE.
On server environments, I usually do install
java-1.X.Y-vendor-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-devel-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm
java-1.X.Y-vendor-fonts-1.X.Y.Z-Rjpp.i?86.rpm

On a workstation/client environment, your may want to install -alsa or not.
It has been packaged separately in order to isolate the JRE/JDK from the sound lib requirements.
You may need -demo or not.
You may be insterested in -src or not.
And -jdbc is perhaps a misnaming (for historical reasons): it contains the jdbc-odbc bridge and
is packaged separately for isolation reasons, just like with -alsa.

In summary: download the "real" JDK, build them all, and then install the first of the resulting
packages if you want JRE only.
 

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: jpackage-discuss-bounces@zarb.org
[mailto:jpackage-discuss-bounces@zarb.org]Im Auftrag von Gmail User
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Juli 2006 02:41
An: jpackage-discuss@zarb.org
Betreff: [JPackage-discuss] JRE anyone?


Has anyone created JRE RPM that they have not bragged about yet? ;-) I
know there is a JDK package, but since most servers now do not require
JDK to run, I would prefer to stick with JRE, but have an RPM to work
with.

TIA,

Ed

_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
JPackage-discuss@zarb.org
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
JPackage-discuss@zarb.org
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]