[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jfs-discussion
Subject:    Re: [Jfs-discussion]
From:       Johannes Hirte <hirtejs () idmt ! fraunhofer ! de>
Date:       2010-01-07 15:38:45
Message-ID: 201001071638.45475.hirtejs () idmt ! fraunhofer ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Donnerstag 07 Januar 2010 04:54:16 schrieb Tim Nufire:
> > I don't have it any more as I ran into a problem with JFS at 32TiB where
> > it would not check/mount/handle 32TiB+ volumes so had to switch over to
> > XFS.
> 
> Did JFS completely fail at 32 TiB or were you seeing journal problems like
>  I'm seeing? Have you been happy with XFS?

You need really much RAM to check and repair such big XFS volumes. 2TB was too 
much to check on a 32bit machine.

regards,
  Johannes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]