[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jboss-user
Subject:    [JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Notification for removeData() calls
From:       martinLuene <do-not-reply () jboss ! com>
Date:       2005-10-31 14:46:48
Message-ID: 13102033.1130770008466.JavaMail.jboss () colo-br-02 ! atl ! jboss ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello.
1) Calling removeData() for a node, which contains data, i get a NodeVisited \
notification. Instead i would expect a NodeModified notification (And now one \
NodeModifiy-Before and one NodeModify-After notification).

2) Calling removeData() again (now the node has no more data), again
a NodeVisited notification occurs. Here i would expect no notification at all,
since no "modification" happend, especially no NodeModified or NodeModify \
notification. Here you can argue that TreeCache can't suppress all notifications,
where the resulting data is "identical" to the data at the beginning,
so applications must always be able to handle such situations. But where TreeCache \
can easily skip such notifications, it should do so, to reduce overhead.

I'am now using standalonf JBossCache 1.2.4 with BEA weblogic. 
Regards,
Martin

View the original post : \
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3904414#3904414

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3904414



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]