[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jboss-user
Subject:    RE: [JBoss-user] Re: clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB
From:       "Sacha Labourey" <Sacha.Labourey.ml () jboss ! org>
Date:       2003-11-27 22:33:59
[Download RAW message or body]

then simply use sticky sessions on your load-balancer, and do not replicated
anything on jboss side.


  _____  

From: jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of ECY
Sent: vendredi, 28. novembre 2003 03:04
To: jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB


For web client.

Subject: 
          RE: [JBoss-user] clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB
     Date: 
          Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:37:32 +0100
     From: 
          "Sacha Labourey" <Sacha.Labourey.ml@jboss.org>
 Reply-To: 
          jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
       To: 
          <jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
 


  web client or fat java client?
 

        From: jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of ECY
        Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 04:40
        To: jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
        Subject: [JBoss-user] clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB
 
        Sorry for this stupid question, but if I NEED load distribution and
DOESN'T NEED fail-over feature (fault tolerance),
        do I have to cluster the jboss instances when using SLSB?   Or will
load-balancer + sticky session be more
        appropriate for this scenario?
         
        Thanks in advance!
         
        Regards,
        Shotie
 
         



[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=343233322-27112003><FONT face="Courier New" 
color=#0000ff size=2>then simply use sticky sessions on your load-balancer, and 
do not replicated anything on jboss side.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; \
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
  <HR tabIndex=-1>
  <FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net 
  [mailto:jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] <B>On Behalf Of 
  </B>ECY<BR><B>Sent:</B> vendredi, 28. novembre 2003 03:04<BR><B>To:</B> 
  jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> [JBoss-user] Re: 
  clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#008080 size=2>For web client.</FONT></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: \
#008080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">  <DIV><FONT size=2>Subject: 
    <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; RE: [JBoss-user] 
    clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Date: 
    <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 
    13:37:32 +0100<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: 
    <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Sacha Labourey" 
    &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:Sacha.Labourey.ml@jboss.org">Sacha.Labourey.ml@jboss.org</A>&gt;<BR>&nbsp;Reply-To: \
  <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A 
    href="mailto:jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net">jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net</A><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; \
  To: <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net">jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net</A>&gt;</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><FONT size=2>
    <DIV><BR>&nbsp; web client or fat java client?</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; From: <A 
    href="mailto:jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net">jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net</A> \
  [mailto:jboss-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of 
    ECY<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sent: mercredi, 26. 
    novembre 2003 04:40<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; To: <A 
    href="mailto:jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net">jboss-user@lists.sourceforge.net</A><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; \
  Subject: [JBoss-user] clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sorry for this stupid 
    question, but if I NEED load distribution and DOESN'T NEED fail-over feature 
    (fault tolerance),<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; do I have 
    to cluster the jboss instances when using SLSB?&nbsp;&nbsp; Or will 
    load-balancer + sticky session be 
    more<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; appropriate for this 
    scenario?<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
    <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Thanks in 
    advance!<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
    <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
    Regards,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Shotie</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  <BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic