[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       java-apache-framework
Subject:    Re: .sar self-containment issue
From:       Peter Donald <donaldp () apache ! org>
Date:       2001-01-29 13:55:08
[Download RAW message or body]

At 02:40  29/1/01 +0100, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>This comment could explain the problem I'm currently having.  I am assuming
>that the services defined by blocks contained with one .sar file can be
>accesses as dependant services by blocks in another .sar file.  For example,
>we want to be able to access the UsersStore service defined within James
>from blocks we define (amongst other things).  Your comment that ".sars are
>completely and utterly self-contained" would suggest that what I'm proposing
>is not possible unless I de-package the James .sar and repackage its .bars
>into my .sar.  Is that correct ?

yep thats the intention ;) 
Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:    java-apache-framework-on@list.working-dogs.com
To unsubscribe:  java-apache-framework-off@list.working-dogs.com
Problems?:       jon@working-dogs.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]