[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       james-user
Subject:    RE: Antivirus checker mailet
From:       "Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini" <vincenzo.gianferraripini () praxis ! it>
Date:       2003-01-31 22:00:57
[Download RAW message or body]

> | Surely it would be much better, but as you say about the
> Norman | system, it
> | is be more complex to develop, and could be very OS
> dependent.
> norman runs on both Unix/WinTel platforms so it shouldn't be
> an issue, but yes, this approach would be application
> specific (frown) but if it's relatively easy to implement i
> don't see that being a problem.

I will have a look on this Norman.

> you mention doing a test to see what the cpu load might be -
> look also to the time constraint ...

Yes

> |> as for the file extension mailet, that would be rather
> easy;
> |> but i am not sure on it's overall usability as it would
> need
> |> to configured per mailbox.
> | Why per mailbox?
> as an ISP, the user is the one in control and needs to be
> able to decide herself to acept or refuse certain files. i
> cannot arbitrarily say that all attachments that match this
> mask will be deleted as i would loose business.

I understand, you are right from your ISP perspective; my perspective
instead is as a company IT department, that can decide a more restrictive
policy in order to enforce security: users would easily accept it.

Thanks

Vincenzo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]