[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: james-dev
Subject: RE: Confirmed but unidentified memory leak in RC2
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <noel () devtech ! com>
Date: 2006-08-30 15:59:04
Message-ID: NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPGEGGKCAC.noel () devtech ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
> if you are using the BayesianAnalysis mailet, keep in mind that the
> in-memory corpus may slowly grow a little bit, checked mail after
> checked mail. It is done on purpose to reduce the number of computations
> of "degenerated tokens"
Should we look at using references to hold the in-memory corpus as a cache,
and recreate if necessary?
That said, no I don't use the Bayesian code. Just JDBCVirtualUserTable,
mailing list manager, and a few other standards (e.g., delivery mailets).
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic