[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       james-dev
Subject:    RE: Confirmed but unidentified memory leak in RC2
From:       "Noel J. Bergman" <noel () devtech ! com>
Date:       2006-08-30 15:59:04
Message-ID: NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPGEGGKCAC.noel () devtech ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> if you are using the BayesianAnalysis mailet, keep in mind that the
> in-memory corpus may slowly grow a little bit, checked mail after
> checked mail. It is done on purpose to reduce the number of computations
> of "degenerated tokens"

Should we look at using references to hold the in-memory corpus as a cache,
and recreate if necessary?

That said, no I don't use the Bayesian code.  Just JDBCVirtualUserTable,
mailing list manager, and a few other standards (e.g., delivery mailets).

	--- Noel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic