[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       james-dev
Subject:    RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates
From:       "Jason Webb" <jw () inovem ! com>
Date:       2005-04-27 18:24:14
Message-ID: 200504271824.j3RIOK7H031684 () mailer ! progressive-comp ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

In that case definitely use the IMAP2 proposal as it has a set of JUnit
tests to test the protocol.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:mike@cycletime.com]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 16:53
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates
> 
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote:
> > IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP.
> > NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything
> to
> > a permanent store so it's useless for most people at the moment.
> > However if you just want the protocol stack then use the IMAP2 proposal.
> 
> I just want the protocol stack.  My SMTP code right now just dumps the
> received message to the console.  Permanent stores are not an issue
> yet. :)
> 
> -Mike
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]