[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       james-dev
Subject:    RE: Release Plan v2.1 (update)
From:       "Alan Gerhard" <alan.gerhard () GerCom ! Com>
Date:       2002-11-27 1:10:31
[Download RAW message or body]

eventually we will need/use point releases - at least that is the goal; not to
have point releases but to be a major player in the enterprise mail server
space; once there we will have indeed point releases, so, if it's not too much
to set up now and adhere to .. well, it might be better in the long run.

alan



-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:sergek@lokitech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:46 PM
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: Release Plan v2.1 (update)


Charles Benett wrote:
> I agree with Serge's suggestions. My only question would be whether
> James needs point releases (ie James 2.1.1) or whether we major and
> minor are sufficient.
>
> Charles

Yeah, good point.

I didn't mean to imply point releases or branching on alphas were
something we wanted to do very often.  Normally I think we'd only do
either of those when we were focused on a new major/minor release, and
some security or other bug became so glaring that we wanted to make a
very minor bug fix release.

--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
http://www.lokitech.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]